Misconception Clinic and Risk Scenarios
Purpose: The questionnaire showed generally strong knowledge, but a few misconception signals need direct treatment: secret monitoring, AI-made dismissal decisions, real sensitive data in classroom tools, and overconfidence in AI ranking.
Use this page during Session 1 and whenever students propose risky AI use cases.
Core principle
AI can draft, summarize, simulate, and support. Human HR professionals remain accountable for employment decisions, employee dignity, and responsible use of data.
Allowed, restricted, prohibited
| Category | Meaning | HR examples |
|---|---|---|
| Allowed for classroom prototype | Low-risk, fictional, reviewed by humans | Draft onboarding email, fictional FAQ, training poster, synthetic survey theme summary |
| Restricted / requires review | May affect people or use sensitive context | Candidate screening support, performance feedback, employee listening, HR analytics |
| Prohibited in this workshop | High-risk, invasive, or uses real sensitive data | Secret monitoring, AI final dismissal decision, real medical data, real grievance records, real CV ranking |
Misconception 1 — “AI can secretly monitor employee conversations”
Correction
Secret monitoring damages trust, privacy, dignity, and due process. Employee listening must be transparent, proportionate, and governed.
Classroom activity prompt
Create a 5-minute classroom activity explaining why secret employee monitoring is not responsible Digital HRM.
Include:
- A fictional Sri Lankan workplace scenario
- What HR wants to achieve
- Why secret monitoring is risky
- A safer alternative
- One discussion question
Misconception 2 — “AI can make final dismissal decisions”
Correction
Dismissal is a high-stakes employment decision. AI may help organize evidence or draft documentation, but humans must review context, policy, fairness, proportionality, and due process.
Classroom activity prompt
Create a human-in-the-loop decision wall for HRM students.
List 12 HR decisions and classify them as:
- AI drafting support is acceptable
- AI analysis may assist but human approval is required
- AI should not be used for the decision
Include hiring, onboarding, training, leave, performance, discipline, termination, and employee relations examples.
Misconception 3 — “Real medical or disciplinary records are okay for classroom AI practice”
Correction
Classroom AI practice should use synthetic or fictional data. Medical, disciplinary, grievance, salary, and personal records are sensitive and should not be uploaded to public AI tools.
Classroom activity prompt
Create a synthetic-data safety drill for HRM students.
Give 10 data examples and ask students to classify each as:
- Safe for classroom AI use
- Use only if anonymized and approved
- Do not use
Include examples involving CVs, student IDs, salary data, medical data, engagement comments, fictional resumes, and synthetic survey data.
Misconception 4 — “AI ranking is objective”
Correction
AI ranking can reflect biased data, flawed criteria, proxy variables, or incomplete context. Structured criteria and human review are essential.
Classroom activity prompt
Create a mini recruitment bias case for Sri Lankan HRM students.
Scenario:
A fictional bank uses AI to rank management trainee applicants. The tool gives lower scores to candidates from non-English-medium backgrounds and some provinces.
Provide:
- What might be causing the issue
- Why this is a fairness risk
- What data HR should inspect
- What human review should happen
- How to redesign the process with structured criteria
10-minute clinic flow
| Time | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0–2 min | Show the four misconception signals |
| 2–4 min | Ask students to classify examples as allowed, restricted, prohibited |
| 4–7 min | Discuss one high-risk scenario in teams |
| 7–9 min | Teams propose a safer redesign |
| 9–10 min | Instructor reinforces the synthetic-data and human-accountability rules |
Quick examples for classification
| Example | Classification | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Draft a fictional onboarding message | Allowed | Low-risk draft for human review |
| Summarize synthetic engagement comments | Allowed with caution | Avoid identifying individuals |
| AI shortlist of real candidates | Restricted | Affects hiring; requires audit and human review |
| AI final termination decision | Prohibited | High-stakes decision requiring due process |
| Upload real disciplinary record to public AI | Prohibited | Sensitive personal data |
| AI-generated training poster | Allowed | Low-risk communication if checked |
| Hidden productivity tracking | Prohibited | Surveillance and trust risk |
Instructor reminder
Treat misconceptions as learning opportunities, not mistakes to shame. Students are building professional judgment.